<p style="margin-bottom:0pt; margin-top:0pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt ; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-autospace:ideograph-other; vertical-align:; "><span style="letter-spacing: 0pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: Arial;">林鄭率四名特區官員與學生對話,即場提出四點回應以示誠意,其中向國務院港澳辦提交民情報告,以及設立多方對話平台,都是以前從未提過的,可算是對話的「具體成果」。然而一如所料,學生並不領情,反提出人大常委應改變決定,並訂出真普選時間表和路線圖。結果雙方的建議「大纜都絞唔埋」</span><span style="letter-spacing: 0pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: Arial;">(搞不到一塊)</span><span style="letter-spacing: 0pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: Arial;">,各自表述,即使再有第二輪對談,相信也不能談出什麼成果。</span></p><p style="margin-bottom:0pt; margin-top:0pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt ; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-autospace:ideograph-other; vertical-align:; "> </p><p style="margin-bottom:0pt; margin-top:0pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt ; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-autospace:ideograph-other; vertical-align:; "><span style="letter-spacing: 0pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: Arial;">對話暫時落幕,主戰場的焦點正轉向兩大問題,一是佔領行動的外部勢力介入,二是中央要力撐梁振英,任何針對梁的言論和動作都要收起,不得亂動。</span></p><p style="margin-bottom:0pt; margin-top:0pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt ; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-autospace:ideograph-other; vertical-align:; "> </p><p style="margin-bottom:0pt; margin-top:0pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt ; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-autospace:ideograph-other; vertical-align:; "><span style="letter-spacing: 0pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: Arial;">外部勢力介入佔領行動,最早見諸內地《人民日報》和《環球時報》的評論,這些論調,香港人「熟口熟面」,但多持「半信半疑」態度,直到梁振英早前接受外國媒體訪問時,也言之鑿鑿說佔領運動有外力介入,並非猜測,並說會在適當時間披露詳情。</span></p><p style="margin-bottom:0pt; margin-top:0pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt ; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-autospace:ideograph-other; vertical-align:; "> </p><p style="margin-bottom:0pt; margin-top:0pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt ; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-autospace:ideograph-other; vertical-align:; "><span style="letter-spacing: 0pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: Arial;">筆者所知,外部勢力介入的基本論點和分析,盡在一套由錫安教會拍製的紀錄片,該片列舉美國介入別國策劃騷亂的十二個步驟,信報網站把該片「轉載」上網,大家不妨一看,應有助了解「外力干預」的基本分析。</span></p><p style="margin-bottom:0pt; margin-top:0pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt ; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-autospace:ideograph-other; vertical-align:; "> </p><p style="margin-bottom:0pt; margin-top:0pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt ; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-autospace:ideograph-other; vertical-align:; "><span style="letter-spacing: 0pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: Arial;">既有外力介入,背後自然有陰謀,要CY下台是其中一招。為了遏止陰謀得逞,北京必須立場堅定,全力挺梁繼續執政。近日建制陣營內的政界、商界和社會領袖都收到「忠告」,暫時要避免批評CY,或不要提「CY下台」等訴求。董建華昨天公開挺梁,只是「貫徹中央路線」而已。</span></p><p style="margin-bottom:0pt; margin-top:0pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt ; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-autospace:ideograph-other; vertical-align:; "> </p><p style="margin-bottom:0pt; margin-top:0pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt ; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-autospace:ideograph-other; vertical-align:; "><span style="letter-spacing: 0pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: Arial;">特區政府與學生代表對話未能取得突破,中央政府則堅稱佔領運動有外國勢力介入,因而要堅決頂住,力挺特首梁振英,在普選議題上也不會讓步。換言之,整個佔領運動至今已陷入僵局,看不出半點曙光。</span></p><p style="margin-bottom:0pt; margin-top:0pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt ; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-autospace:ideograph-other; vertical-align:; "> </p><p style="margin-bottom:0pt; margin-top:0pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt ; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-autospace:ideograph-other; vertical-align:; "><span style="letter-spacing: 0pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: Arial;">建制陣營對局勢的發展有幾點估計。一是加強勸退攻勢,動員各方頭面人物勸諭學生撤退,但此法看來沒多大成效;二是北京收到特區政府的報告後在人大框架上讓步,令佔領者願意退場,這點機會更微;三是僵持不下,雙方都不讓,政府按原定時間表草擬政改方案供立法會投票,但結果可知,方案不能通過,普選無法落實,街頭示威者可以有理由鳴金收兵,社會暫時回復平靜。</span></p><div> </div><p style="margin-bottom:0pt; margin-top:0pt; "><span style="letter-spacing: 0pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: Arial;">不過,如果2017年沒有普選,政府施政必然困阻重重,危機更加嚴重。縱使不願見,但第三種情況極可能成為事實。</span></p>