許仕仁郭炳江罪成 郭炳聯甩身

<p style="margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt ; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-autospace:ideograph-other; layout-grid-mode:char; vertical-align:; "><span style="letter-spacing: 0pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: Arial;">前政務司司長許仕仁與新地聯席主席郭炳江與郭炳聯捲入的「世紀巨貪案」,陪審團經過近45小時商議後,周五達成裁決。許仕仁5項罪成,是歷來被定罪的最高級政府官員;郭氏兄弟則有喜有悲,郭炳江被控3項串謀公職人員行為失當罪,其中1項成立;面對4項控罪的郭炳聯則全部甩身,當庭釋放;其餘兩名被告、新地執行董事陳鉅源及港交所前高級副總裁關雄生,各自的兩項控罪亦同樣成立。被定罪的4名被告雖表明上訴,但仍須即時還押,等候法官周一聽取求情後判刑。</span></p><p style="margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt ; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-autospace:ideograph-other; layout-grid-mode:char; vertical-align:; ">&nbsp;</p><div><img src="/EditBackyard/EditorData/Photo/958143_96c8e6848b07c777f7777c3c1564ec96.jpg" width="400" height="292" alt="" />&nbsp;</div><p style="margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt ; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-autospace:ideograph-other; layout-grid-mode:char; vertical-align:; "><span style="letter-spacing: 0pt; font-style: italic; font-size: 12pt; font-family: Arial;">陪審團經過近45小時商議後達成裁決,許仕仁5項罪名成立,郭炳江(圖右)及陳鉅源(圖左)則分別有1項及兩項控罪成立,須即時還押在監獄中過冬。</span></p><p style="margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt ; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-autospace:ideograph-other; layout-grid-mode:char; vertical-align:; ">&nbsp;</p><p style="margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt ; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-autospace:ideograph-other; layout-grid-mode:char; vertical-align:; "><span style="letter-spacing: 0pt; font-weight: bold; font-size: 12pt; font-family: Arial;">4被告表明會上訴</span></p><p style="margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt ; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-autospace:ideograph-other; layout-grid-mode:char; vertical-align:; ">&nbsp;</p><p style="margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt ; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-autospace:ideograph-other; layout-grid-mode:char; vertical-align:; "><span style="letter-spacing: 0pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: Arial;">涉及全部8項控罪的許仕仁,被裁定罪成的5項,包括3項公職人員行為失當、1項串謀公職人員行為失當,以及1項串謀向公職人員提供利益。根據案情,許任職積金局時,隱瞞免租入住新地旗下跑馬地禮頓山相連單位、向新地旗下財務公司申請240萬元無抵押貸款,以及與新地洽談顧問合約,因此被裁定公職人員行為失當。</span></p><p style="margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt ; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-autospace:ideograph-other; layout-grid-mode:char; vertical-align:; ">&nbsp;</p><p style="margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt ; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-autospace:ideograph-other; layout-grid-mode:char; vertical-align:; "><span style="letter-spacing: 0pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: Arial;">另一項控罪,是指許仕仁2005年上任政務司司長前夕,透過陳鉅源及關雄生分批收取郭炳江850萬元,4人因此同被裁定串謀公職人員行為失當罪成。而許仕仁上任司長後,之前的貸款不斷獲延期,又未曾償還本金,且一直無申報,故屬公職人員行為失當;到了2007年,許仕仁任行政會議非官守成員期間,收取來自陳及關的1118.2萬元,就這項串謀向公職人員提供利益罪,許、陳、關3人皆罪成,郭氏兄弟則脫罪。根據法例,上述各項罪名的最高刑罰均為入獄7年。</span></p><p style="margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt ; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-autospace:ideograph-other; layout-grid-mode:char; vertical-align:; ">&nbsp;</p><p style="margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt ; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-autospace:ideograph-other; layout-grid-mode:char; vertical-align:; "><span style="letter-spacing: 0pt; font-weight: bold; font-size: 12pt; font-family: Arial;">傳提交四叔求情信</span></p><p style="margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt ; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-autospace:ideograph-other; layout-grid-mode:char; vertical-align:; ">&nbsp;</p><p style="margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt ; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-autospace:ideograph-other; layout-grid-mode:char; vertical-align:; "><span style="letter-spacing: 0pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: Arial;">本案唯一「甩難」的是郭炳聯,他面對4項控罪,包括2005年向許仕仁支付412.5萬元顧問費特別花紅,結果被裁定無罪,連帶1項提供虛假資料罪名亦不成立。而控方在知悉判決後,向法官申請取消郭炳江及陳鉅源任董事的資格,但未待法庭處理,同日郭、陳已隨即辭去新地董事職務。</span></p><div>&nbsp;</div><p style="margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt ; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-autospace:ideograph-other; layout-grid-mode:char; vertical-align:; "><span style="letter-spacing: 0pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: Arial;">主審法官麥機智在庭上指出,被告遭定罪後必須還押,以待他周一聽取求情後判刑,4人其後由囚車載往荔枝角收押所。他們的代表律師均表明會上訴,其中代表郭炳江的資深大律師駱應淦直言,對裁決感到古怪及難以理解,因為郭炳江就3項罪名均以同一理由抗辯,既然其他兩項罪名不成立,另1項亦無理由成立;駱又透露已準備了13、14封求情信,分別來自商界及新地員工,據知當中包括恒地主席李兆基。</span></p><p style="margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt ; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-autospace:ideograph-other; layout-grid-mode:char; vertical-align:; ">&nbsp;</p><p style="margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt ; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-autospace:ideograph-other; layout-grid-mode:char; vertical-align:; "><span style="letter-spacing: 0pt; font-weight: bold; font-size: 12pt; font-family: Arial;">保安局長:市民歡迎</span></p><p style="margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt ; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-autospace:ideograph-other; layout-grid-mode:char; vertical-align:; ">&nbsp;</p><p style="margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt ; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-autospace:ideograph-other; layout-grid-mode:char; vertical-align:; "><span style="letter-spacing: 0pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: Arial;">另一邊廂,主控官David&nbsp;Perry滿意今次裁決,認為對香港是好事。廉政公署發言人則表示,案件反映廉署堅守維護香港廉潔的決心,強調不論涉案者的背景、身份和地位,廉署均嚴格遵守依法辦事的原則,鍥而不捨,不偏不倚地進行執法工作。因應案件揭示的問題,廉署會向政府當局反映,並樂意就有關的防貪及教育工作提供意見。</span></p><p style="margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt ; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-autospace:ideograph-other; layout-grid-mode:char; vertical-align:; ">&nbsp;</p><p style="margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; "><span style="letter-spacing: 0pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: Arial;">保安局局長黎棟國則表示,香港社會要求政府人員要保持廉潔,廉署任何成功檢控都會獲市民歡迎。中大政治與行政學系高級講師蔡子強則認為,案件加深社會對官商勾結印象,衝擊政府公信力及廉潔,令管治更困難。</span></p>


Notice: Undefined offset: 0 in /home/chinai11/public_html/wp-content/plugins/custom-author/custom-author.php on line 91
发布于要闻