<p style="margin-top:0.0000pt; margin-right:0.0000pt; margin-bottom:0.0000pt; margin-left:0.0000pt; text-indent:0.0000pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt ; layout-grid-mode:char; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-justify:inter-ideograph; "><span style="font-family: Arial; letter-spacing: 0pt; font-size: 12pt;">政務司司長林鄭月娥昨天在立法會正式公布政改方案，以不太討好的「一定要得」作為口號推銷，此似曾相識的口號難免讓人憶起二○○○年申辦亞運所用的「香港一定得」，結果當時同樣是政務司司長的陳方安生鎩羽而回，沒法向亞奧理事會成功「撬票」，申辦亞運失敗了。就在政改方案公布以後，一次又一次表明立場必定投下反對票的二十三名泛民議員離場抗議，人去椅空的議事堂剩下公民黨湯家驊的孤獨身影。湯家驊雖然始終聲稱會否決政改方案，但他明言對於泛民的姿態感到厭倦，不再參與「三日一記招、五日一聯署」。</span></p><p style="margin-top:0.0000pt; margin-right:0.0000pt; margin-bottom:0.0000pt; margin-left:0.0000pt; text-indent:0.0000pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt ; layout-grid-mode:char; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-justify:inter-ideograph; "> </p><p style="margin-top:0.0000pt; margin-right:0.0000pt; margin-bottom:0.0000pt; margin-left:0.0000pt; text-indent:0.0000pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt ; layout-grid-mode:char; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-justify:inter-ideograph; "><span style="font-family: Arial; letter-spacing: 0pt; font-size: 12pt;">湯家驊一士諤諤的悲涼，也許正是社會上溫和聲音的無奈象徵，一方面不滿人大常委會「八三一」框架為普選特首設限，一人一票沒有具備完全的選擇，另一方面又為了社會撕裂得非黑即白忐忑不安。</span></p><p style="margin-top:0.0000pt; margin-right:0.0000pt; margin-bottom:0.0000pt; margin-left:0.0000pt; text-indent:0.0000pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt ; layout-grid-mode:char; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-justify:inter-ideograph; "> </p><p style="margin-top:0.0000pt; margin-right:0.0000pt; margin-bottom:0.0000pt; margin-left:0.0000pt; text-indent:0.0000pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt ; layout-grid-mode:char; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-justify:inter-ideograph; "><span style="font-family: Arial; letter-spacing: 0pt; font-size: 12pt;">政改方案的內容沒有太多新意，簡單來說只是降低入閘門檻，變相容許泛民主派能夠有人得到提委會開綠燈入閘，然而出閘門檻依然是緊跟中央決定的過半數，泛民參選者難以升格為正式候選人。由於出閘門檻不變，反對派姿態也是不變，泛民飯盒會召集人梁家傑發表宣言，認為方案容許小圈子操控提名程序，藉此操控選舉結果，使香港人淪為投票工具，香港人會捍衞尊嚴，向假普選說不。</span></p><div> </div><p style="margin-top:0.0000pt; margin-right:0.0000pt; margin-bottom:0.0000pt; margin-left:0.0000pt; text-indent:0.0000pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt ; layout-grid-mode:char; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-justify:inter-ideograph; "><span style="font-family: Arial; letter-spacing: 0pt; font-size: 12pt;">泛民的立場大家知之甚詳，不必細表，建制派的看法亦是婦孺皆見，多說嫌贅，彼此之間的鴻溝恍似橫亙着絕情谷與斷腸崖。既然拗來拗去拗不出一個所以然來，不如另闢蹊徑，放下君子外衣，甩開頭上光環，撤離道德高地，嘗試以小人之心度小人之腹。</span></p><p style="margin-top:0.0000pt; margin-right:0.0000pt; margin-bottom:0.0000pt; margin-left:0.0000pt; text-indent:0.0000pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt ; layout-grid-mode:char; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-justify:inter-ideograph; "> </p><p style="margin-top:0.0000pt; margin-right:0.0000pt; margin-bottom:0.0000pt; margin-left:0.0000pt; text-indent:0.0000pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt ; layout-grid-mode:char; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-justify:inter-ideograph; "><span style="font-family: Arial; letter-spacing: 0pt; font-size: 12pt;">泛民拒絕支持政改方案的原因是不信任中央，認為「袋住先」等於「袋一世」，立場並不激進的溫和聲音難免要問，假設中央確是信不過，甚至假設北京不介意搬龍門，泛民如何說服公眾，否決了政改方案之後會從中央手上得到一個符合國際標準的真普選？現在因為害怕「袋一世」而不惜一拍兩散，寧願原地踏步繼續任由小圈子選特首，到頭來是否會出現等到白髮蒼蒼也袋裏空空的「待一世」？既然認定中央是小人，那麼就不應該自命為君子，必須以小人的心思忖度之，今天不給你真普選，明天一樣不給你真普選，後天依舊不給你真普選。那就是說，若然因為政改方案不完善而拒絕接受，美其名曰捍衞尊嚴，日後可能什麼也沒有，香港人將會更加缺乏尊嚴地生活於連一人一票也欠奉的政治環境。</span></p><p style="margin-top:0.0000pt; margin-right:0.0000pt; margin-bottom:0.0000pt; margin-left:0.0000pt; text-indent:0.0000pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt ; layout-grid-mode:char; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-justify:inter-ideograph; "> </p><p style="margin-top:0.0000pt; margin-right:0.0000pt; margin-bottom:0.0000pt; margin-left:0.0000pt; text-indent:0.0000pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt ; layout-grid-mode:char; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-justify:inter-ideograph; "><span style="font-family: Arial; letter-spacing: 0pt; font-size: 12pt;">這種不君子的小人論，也許是部分溫和泛民的心底話，但他們不好意思講出口，只好含糊其辭地表示，百鳥在林不如一鳥在手，呼籲大家「袋住先」，留待日後再優化。其實，正正是因為泛民與中央嚴重缺乏互信，在不信任中央的大前提之下，泛民更加有必要考量一個問題，這次不要，下次還有沒有機會要？現在放棄得寸，日後怎樣進尺？情況好比追債，債仔欠下一百萬元爛賬撒賴不還，債主窮追猛打，最終債仔願意「還住先」交出五十萬，債主要不要？不要則什麼也沒有，要的話，尚有機會繼續窮追猛打討回尾數。</span></p><p style="margin-top:0.0000pt; margin-right:0.0000pt; margin-bottom:0.0000pt; margin-left:0.0000pt; text-indent:0.0000pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt ; layout-grid-mode:char; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-justify:inter-ideograph; "> </p><p style="margin-top:0.0000pt; margin-right:0.0000pt; margin-bottom:0.0000pt; margin-left:0.0000pt; text-indent:0.0000pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt ; layout-grid-mode:char; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-justify:inter-ideograph; "><span style="font-family: Arial; letter-spacing: 0pt; font-size: 12pt;">猶記得二○一○年討論二○一二年政改，由於區議會改良方案可以增加五個民選議席，已故的民主黨元老司徒華先生鎮住大局，頂住各方壓力決定支持方案，儘管被激進同路者羞辱為「民主罪人」和「癌症上腦」，仍然促成民主黨投票通過當時的政改方案，錚錚風骨的領袖必然盤算着避免打一場沒把握的仗，有改良好過無寸進。聞戰鼓，思良將，司徒華先生若然在世，相信會讓很多人明白何謂進退有度。</span></p><p style="margin-top:0.0000pt; margin-right:0.0000pt; margin-bottom:0.0000pt; margin-left:0.0000pt; text-indent:0.0000pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt ; layout-grid-mode:char; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-justify:inter-ideograph; "> </p><p><span style="font-family: Arial; letter-spacing: 0pt; font-size: 12pt;">以小人之心度小人之腹，爭取普選最可怕的結果是「待一世」。</span></p>