<p style="margin-top:0.0000pt; margin-right:0.0000pt; margin-bottom:0.0000pt; margin-left:0.0000pt; text-indent:0.0000pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt ; layout-grid-mode:char; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-justify:inter-ideograph; "><span style="font-family: Arial; letter-spacing: 0pt; font-size: 12pt;">政改方案出現世紀性荒謬鬧劇,32名建制派議員臨時拉隊離場,連同聲稱有病姍姍來遲的劉皇發,締造了令人意想不到的結果,就是按照人大八三一決定框架制訂的假普選方案,以28票對8票大比數否決。這一個任何人也無法改變的歷史紀錄,與中共中央事前傾盡人力物力、精心策劃部署企圖製造的結果大相徑庭,甚至可說是走向反面,又豈能不令中央先是震驚、繼而憤怒之餘,不查明真相,追究責任?</span></p><p style="margin-top:0.0000pt; margin-right:0.0000pt; margin-bottom:0.0000pt; margin-left:0.0000pt; text-indent:0.0000pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt ; layout-grid-mode:char; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-justify:inter-ideograph; "> </p><p style="margin-top:0.0000pt; margin-right:0.0000pt; margin-bottom:0.0000pt; margin-left:0.0000pt; text-indent:0.0000pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt ; layout-grid-mode:char; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-justify:inter-ideograph; "><span style="font-family: Arial; letter-spacing: 0pt; font-size: 12pt;">中央原定的計劃非常明確,就是明知在27名泛民議員和「怪醫」梁家騮的一票不能爭取過來的情況下,決定指令建制派42人全部投票支持政改方案,一票也不能少,目的旨在於表決後開展政治攻勢,把矛頭指向泛民,諉過為歷史罪人,阻礙香港民主進程,剝奪全港500萬合資格選民一人一票普選特首的民主夢。政治上全面圍剿泛民,目的是要達致第二個「硬任務」,在年底的區議會選舉和明年的立法會選舉,全力爭取議席,務求一舉而把泛民的政治勢力殲滅,攆出政治舞台;至低限度,建制派要成為議會裏的壓倒性大多數,足以全面操控各級議會。</span></p><p style="margin-top:0.0000pt; margin-right:0.0000pt; margin-bottom:0.0000pt; margin-left:0.0000pt; text-indent:0.0000pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt ; layout-grid-mode:char; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-justify:inter-ideograph; "> </p><p style="margin-top:0.0000pt; margin-right:0.0000pt; margin-bottom:0.0000pt; margin-left:0.0000pt; text-indent:0.0000pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt ; layout-grid-mode:char; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-justify:inter-ideograph; "><span style="font-family: Arial; letter-spacing: 0pt; font-weight: bold; font-size: 12pt;">不跟大隊 才是死罪</span></p><p style="margin-top:0.0000pt; margin-right:0.0000pt; margin-bottom:0.0000pt; margin-left:0.0000pt; text-indent:0.0000pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt ; layout-grid-mode:char; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-justify:inter-ideograph; "> </p><p style="margin-top:0.0000pt; margin-right:0.0000pt; margin-bottom:0.0000pt; margin-left:0.0000pt; text-indent:0.0000pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt ; layout-grid-mode:char; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-justify:inter-ideograph; "><span style="font-family: Arial; letter-spacing: 0pt; font-size: 12pt;">可惜,人算不如天算,神推鬼㧬、陰差陽錯之下,梅菲定律(Murphy\’s Law)發揮了效用,長期欠缺紀律、尸位素餐、各懷鬼胎、一盤散沙的建制派在關鍵時刻,干犯了所有可能干犯的錯誤,凡有可能出錯的,就一定出錯,凡是最糟糕的錯誤,就出現最糟糕的錯誤,結果一敗塗地,一群蠢蛋豬玀,炮製了可以笑足一世的荒謬鬧劇。</span></p><p style="margin-top:0.0000pt; margin-right:0.0000pt; margin-bottom:0.0000pt; margin-left:0.0000pt; text-indent:0.0000pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt ; layout-grid-mode:char; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-justify:inter-ideograph; "> </p><p style="margin-top:0.0000pt; margin-right:0.0000pt; margin-bottom:0.0000pt; margin-left:0.0000pt; text-indent:0.0000pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt ; layout-grid-mode:char; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-justify:inter-ideograph; "><span style="font-family: Arial; letter-spacing: 0pt; font-size: 12pt;">沒有一個建制派是可以逃避政治責任的,包括32名場外事後表心跡的議員,以及場內紋風不動投票支持或沒有投票的9名議員。正是違背上旨,得罪天庭,不知至今仍未表態的中央如何定性和追究,所有有關人等才倉皇失措,事後不約而同急急跑出來解畫,企圖為自己開脫責任。</span></p><p style="margin-top:0.0000pt; margin-right:0.0000pt; margin-bottom:0.0000pt; margin-left:0.0000pt; text-indent:0.0000pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt ; layout-grid-mode:char; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-justify:inter-ideograph; "> </p><p style="margin-top:0.0000pt; margin-right:0.0000pt; margin-bottom:0.0000pt; margin-left:0.0000pt; text-indent:0.0000pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt ; layout-grid-mode:char; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-justify:inter-ideograph; "><span style="font-family: Arial; letter-spacing: 0pt; font-size: 12pt;">葉劉淑儀、林健鋒和陳婉嫻皆先後痛哭流涕,淚灑人前。廉價的鱷魚淚只能說明他們真的是怕得要死。葉劉與林都是行政會議成員,又是新民黨黨魁和中聯辦一手培植的經民聯當家,在重要時刻,既毫無應變能力和領導才能,復不熟《議事規則》,以致一子錯,滿盤皆落索,完全倒瀉籮蟹,終至不可收拾的地步。事實充分說明,他們全都是中看不中用的政治廢物,難以寄以重任。陳婉嫻是資深土共,在關鍵時刻,完全個人主義,自我至上,忘記了黨的命令——理解要服從,不理解也要服從,並無置喙之餘地。</span></p><p style="margin-top:0.0000pt; margin-right:0.0000pt; margin-bottom:0.0000pt; margin-left:0.0000pt; text-indent:0.0000pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt ; layout-grid-mode:char; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-justify:inter-ideograph; "> </p><p style="margin-top:0.0000pt; margin-right:0.0000pt; margin-bottom:0.0000pt; margin-left:0.0000pt; text-indent:0.0000pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt ; layout-grid-mode:char; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-justify:inter-ideograph; "><span style="font-family: Arial; letter-spacing: 0pt; font-size: 12pt;">另一個行政會議成員民建聯新任主席李慧琼亦自暴其短,活脫脫是個有名無實的政治傀儡。資深土共譚耀宗和葉國謙皆老貓燒鬚,既受林健鋒擺弄,毫無主見,復欠領袖應有的威信,無法號令全體建制派一致行動,明顯是將令不行。</span></p><p style="margin-top:0.0000pt; margin-right:0.0000pt; margin-bottom:0.0000pt; margin-left:0.0000pt; text-indent:0.0000pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt ; layout-grid-mode:char; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-justify:inter-ideograph; "> </p><p style="margin-top:0.0000pt; margin-right:0.0000pt; margin-bottom:0.0000pt; margin-left:0.0000pt; text-indent:0.0000pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt ; layout-grid-mode:char; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-justify:inter-ideograph; "><span style="font-family: Arial; letter-spacing: 0pt; font-size: 12pt;">工聯會的黃國健和新民黨的田北辰,以及中聯辦「契仔」謝偉俊,本來都是無足輕重的茄喱啡, 「唔出聲冇人話你啞」,偏偏為了自保,黃國健竟然違犯黨紀,公開責難民建聯領導錯誤,應要承擔最大責任,矛頭直指被葉劉淑儀視為「黨鞭」的葉國謙。</span></p><p style="margin-top:0.0000pt; margin-right:0.0000pt; margin-bottom:0.0000pt; margin-left:0.0000pt; text-indent:0.0000pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt ; layout-grid-mode:char; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-justify:inter-ideograph; "> </p><p style="margin-top:0.0000pt; margin-right:0.0000pt; margin-bottom:0.0000pt; margin-left:0.0000pt; text-indent:0.0000pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt ; layout-grid-mode:char; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-justify:inter-ideograph; "><span style="font-family: Arial; letter-spacing: 0pt; font-size: 12pt;">田北辰更肉酸,兄親弟親不如黨親,為了開脫自己盲從的責任,竟然不惜倒戈相向,撰文大肆抨擊兄長田北俊臨難跳船,不顧全大局,政治嘴臉之勢利和心態之骯髒,令人作嘔。謝偉俊則見獵心喜,眼看葉國謙不濟事,竟想趁機上位,取而代之,用心之卑劣,看在中央眼裏,難道不會「刮目相看」嗎?</span></p><p style="margin-top:0.0000pt; margin-right:0.0000pt; margin-bottom:0.0000pt; margin-left:0.0000pt; text-indent:0.0000pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt ; layout-grid-mode:char; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-justify:inter-ideograph; "> </p><p style="margin-top:0.0000pt; margin-right:0.0000pt; margin-bottom:0.0000pt; margin-left:0.0000pt; text-indent:0.0000pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt ; layout-grid-mode:char; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-justify:inter-ideograph; "><span style="font-family: Arial; letter-spacing: 0pt; font-size: 12pt;">留在議事堂的自由黨和林大輝,表面是英雄,臨危不亂,還自誇中聯辦來電稱讚,實質卻犯了不守紀律的大忌。吳亮星「先執行、後理解」的說法,雖然奴性十足,卻是以我為主的中共最屬意的紀律。既然葉國謙已經臨場通知自由黨主席鍾國斌而田北俊竟不屑一顧,着令黨員全部留下投票,看在中共眼裏,就是搞小山頭,不肯一切聽命中央。</span></p><p style="margin-top:0.0000pt; margin-right:0.0000pt; margin-bottom:0.0000pt; margin-left:0.0000pt; text-indent:0.0000pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt ; layout-grid-mode:char; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-justify:inter-ideograph; "> </p><p style="margin-top:0.0000pt; margin-right:0.0000pt; margin-bottom:0.0000pt; margin-left:0.0000pt; text-indent:0.0000pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt ; layout-grid-mode:char; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-justify:inter-ideograph; "><span style="font-family: Arial; letter-spacing: 0pt; font-size: 12pt;">當年23條立法,田北俊率領自由黨臨陣跳船舊事不忘,跋扈囂張的田北俊今次又再剛愎自用,「壞孩子」的名號只會永不磨滅,長記中央心中。林大輝是唐英年家臣,固然視田北俊為馬首是瞻,陳健波以林大輝為立法會內唯一知己,亦步亦趨,實不難明白;最莫名其妙的是勞聯的潘兆平,既無離場,又不投票,只能以「發瘟」視之,政治前途雖行人止步,但究屬不見經傳的小人物,無足掛齒。</span></p><p style="margin-top:0.0000pt; margin-right:0.0000pt; margin-bottom:0.0000pt; margin-left:0.0000pt; text-indent:0.0000pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt ; layout-grid-mode:char; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-justify:inter-ideograph; "> </p><p style="margin-top:0.0000pt; margin-right:0.0000pt; margin-bottom:0.0000pt; margin-left:0.0000pt; text-indent:0.0000pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt ; layout-grid-mode:char; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-justify:inter-ideograph; "><span style="font-family: Arial; letter-spacing: 0pt; font-size: 12pt;">梁振英雖對「蝦碌」事件無直接關係,但長期管治無能,領導無方,事後更無召集建制派檢討,完全失職。但為了自保,689也迫得放棄利用民生議題迫使泛民通過成立創新及科技局的建議,把11項民生議題提前表決,以所謂發展經濟和改善民生暫時補鑊。</span></p><p style="margin-top:0.0000pt; margin-right:0.0000pt; margin-bottom:0.0000pt; margin-left:0.0000pt; text-indent:0.0000pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt ; layout-grid-mode:char; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-justify:inter-ideograph; "> </p><p style="margin-top:0.0000pt; margin-right:0.0000pt; margin-bottom:0.0000pt; margin-left:0.0000pt; text-indent:0.0000pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt ; layout-grid-mode:char; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-justify:inter-ideograph; "><span style="font-family: Arial; letter-spacing: 0pt; font-size: 12pt;">為了替自己解說,建制派炮製了「場外投票」的論述,以及辯解因恐防陳偉業拉布才臨時改弦更張,提前表決,以及「等埋發叔」之目的是餘下4名泛民議員馮檢基、涂謹申、陳家洛和陳偉業有可能臨時轉軚支持方案,所以需要發叔關鍵一票湊夠三分之二多數,創造歷史奇蹟等。上述一切荒謬的辯解,無非是向愚蠢的支持者交代,但亦正好說明這群烏合之眾的建制派人人自危,正在千方百計編造故事,謀求脫身,極恐怒不可遏的中央降罪。</span></p><p style="margin-top:0.0000pt; margin-right:0.0000pt; margin-bottom:0.0000pt; margin-left:0.0000pt; text-indent:0.0000pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt ; layout-grid-mode:char; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-justify:inter-ideograph; "> </p><p style="margin-top:0.0000pt; margin-right:0.0000pt; margin-bottom:0.0000pt; margin-left:0.0000pt; text-indent:0.0000pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt ; layout-grid-mode:char; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-justify:inter-ideograph; "><span style="font-family: Arial; letter-spacing: 0pt; font-size: 12pt;">事到如今,中央相關官員仍未表態,短時間內中央也許一動不如一靜,其西環代表宴請各方甚至主動傳話安慰,但這只是門面工夫,顧及各方面子及友情,只可以說,這是一場狂風暴雨的前夕。建制保皇的各方代理人,全面整頓在所難免。</span></p><p style="margin-top:0.0000pt; margin-right:0.0000pt; margin-bottom:0.0000pt; margin-left:0.0000pt; text-indent:0.0000pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt ; layout-grid-mode:char; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-justify:inter-ideograph; "> </p><p style="margin-top:0.0000pt; margin-right:0.0000pt; margin-bottom:0.0000pt; margin-left:0.0000pt; text-indent:0.0000pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt ; layout-grid-mode:char; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-justify:inter-ideograph; "><span style="font-family: Arial; letter-spacing: 0pt; font-weight: bold; font-size: 12pt;">主席行為 有欠公正</span></p><p style="margin-top:0.0000pt; margin-right:0.0000pt; margin-bottom:0.0000pt; margin-left:0.0000pt; text-indent:0.0000pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt ; layout-grid-mode:char; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-justify:inter-ideograph; "> </p><p style="margin-top:0.0000pt; margin-right:0.0000pt; margin-bottom:0.0000pt; margin-left:0.0000pt; text-indent:0.0000pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt ; layout-grid-mode:char; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-justify:inter-ideograph; "><span style="font-family: Arial; letter-spacing: 0pt; font-size: 12pt;">在共產黨的思維裏,愚蠢不是罪,保皇黨本來就毋須思考只須服從,理解要執行,不理解也要執行,拉隊離場和盲目跟隨走出的,最多只會被怪責愚蠢辦事不力,但當其他保皇人士拉隊走人你卻不主動跟隨反而留下,則是大逆不道,黨性欠奉,勢將被追究,一旦被中央視為叛徒,其後果定當非常嚴重。自由黨與林大輝等人,別高興得太早。</span></p><p style="margin-top:0.0000pt; margin-right:0.0000pt; margin-bottom:0.0000pt; margin-left:0.0000pt; text-indent:0.0000pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt ; layout-grid-mode:char; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-justify:inter-ideograph; "> </p><p style="margin-top:0.0000pt; margin-right:0.0000pt; margin-bottom:0.0000pt; margin-left:0.0000pt; text-indent:0.0000pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt ; layout-grid-mode:char; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-justify:inter-ideograph; "><span style="font-family: Arial; letter-spacing: 0pt; font-size: 12pt;">只是,田北俊也許失意於中央,但繼23條一役後田大少再次成為人民英雄,民間政治本錢大增,可謂報卻了「搣柴」的一戰之仇。政改這場不義之戰如果有贏家,田北俊可能就是唯一的贏家。</span></p><p style="margin-top:0.0000pt; margin-right:0.0000pt; margin-bottom:0.0000pt; margin-left:0.0000pt; text-indent:0.0000pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt ; layout-grid-mode:char; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-justify:inter-ideograph; "> </p><p style="margin-top:0.0000pt; margin-right:0.0000pt; margin-bottom:0.0000pt; margin-left:0.0000pt; text-indent:0.0000pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt ; layout-grid-mode:char; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-justify:inter-ideograph; "><span style="font-family: Arial; letter-spacing: 0pt; font-size: 12pt;">中聯辦主任張曉明召見42名建制派議員,並非「飲杯茶,食個包」咁簡單,而是召開正式檢討大會,向中央提交報告。開會前夕,更爆出立法會主席曾鈺成捲入以WhatsApp與建制派議員互通訊息、指揮大局的醜聞,充分顯示曾鈺成並非政治中立,而是吹黑哨的球證。這一單醜聞,比建制派「蝦碌」事件更嚴重,完全破壞立法會的公信力,曾鈺成一定要引咎辭職,泛民如果放過他一馬,就更加罪不可恕。</span></p><p style="margin-top:0.0000pt; margin-right:0.0000pt; margin-bottom:0.0000pt; margin-left:0.0000pt; text-indent:0.0000pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt ; layout-grid-mode:char; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-justify:inter-ideograph; "> </p><p style="margin-top:0.0000pt; margin-right:0.0000pt; margin-bottom:0.0000pt; margin-left:0.0000pt; text-indent:0.0000pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt ; layout-grid-mode:char; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-justify:inter-ideograph; "><span style="font-family: Arial; letter-spacing: 0pt; font-size: 12pt;">中央最重視團結,辦事不力還情有可原,但事敗後保皇各派竟然互相指摘勾心鬥角互數不是,甚至暗中放料,連建制內部通訊群組內容也曝光,肯定令中央大為震怒,建制派內一場腥風血雨的大屠殺,在所難免。</span></p><p style="margin-top:0.0000pt; margin-right:0.0000pt; margin-bottom:0.0000pt; margin-left:0.0000pt; text-indent:0.0000pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt ; layout-grid-mode:char; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-justify:inter-ideograph; "> </p><p style="margin-top:0.0000pt; margin-right:0.0000pt; margin-bottom:0.0000pt; margin-left:0.0000pt; text-indent:0.0000pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt ; layout-grid-mode:char; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-justify:inter-ideograph; "><span style="font-family: Arial; letter-spacing: 0pt; font-size: 12pt;">過去氣燄囂張、不可一世的建制派,今天人人臉如土灰,猶如喪家之犬,苟延殘喘,惶惶不可終日。看在廣大市民眼裏,雖然民主無望,普選遙遙無期,也不期然笑不攏嘴,釋然開懷。</span></p><p style="margin-top:0.0000pt; margin-right:0.0000pt; margin-bottom:0.0000pt; margin-left:0.0000pt; text-indent:0.0000pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt ; layout-grid-mode:char; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-justify:inter-ideograph; "> </p><p><span style="font-family: Arial; letter-spacing: 0pt; font-size: 12pt;">過去20個月內,梁振英政府連同一眾「梁粉」建制中人,氣燄逼人禮崩樂壞,為求推動假普選不擇手段,時而抹黑時而恐嚇,大搞街頭簽名小丑劇,時而上街,時而訴諸制度霸權,威脅如不通過假普選「袋住先」,就會「一世都冇」兼「票債票償」,如今終於自作自受,重挫保皇黨與「梁粉」的氣燄。天理循環應有報,合該如此。</span></p>